Biden’s autopen scandal is nothing short of a coup — and the culprits needs to be held accountable

Just months ago a travesty was taking place in the nation’s capital as the Biden administration drew to a close.

On his way out the door, President Joe Biden commuted the sentences of more than 4,000 federally incarcerated offenders.

Only it wasn’t Biden issuing the record-shattering number of commutations — it was his autopen.

And who controlled that?

The autopen’s last-minute pardons and commutations weren’t approved by the Justice Department:

“​​There was a mad dash to find groups of people that he could then pardon — and then they largely didn’t run it by the Justice Department to vet them,” a source told the DC insider publication Axios.

While Biden claimed the last-minute blizzard of pardons and commutations was for “nonviolent” drug offenders, a trove of administration emails obtained by The Oversight Project and first reported on by the New York Post’s Josh Christenson tell a different story.

“I think you should stop saying that because it is untrue or at least misleading,” Associate Deputy Attorney General Brad Weinsheimer warned in a Jan. 18 email.

Among those receiving presidential clemency, Weinsheimer noted, “We identified violent offenders, including those who committed acts of violence during the offense of conviction, or who otherwise have a history of violence.”

Subsequent reporting has brought to light extensive correspondence between the West Wing and Justice Department as officials struggled to interpret just what it was the president was doing — or whether he was even aware of what was being done.

After all, it wasn’t his hand signing the papers; it was the autopen.

Four years earlier, when Biden was first taking office, his incoming staff secretary had told him his hand signature should be used for pardons, according to Axios.

But if, by the end, Joe Biden wasn’t running the Biden administration, it doesn’t matter what he’d been told.

It’s happened before: A little more than a hundred years earlier, a stroke had left President Woodrow Wilson unable to discharge the duties of his office.

But instead of a constitutional succession taking place, the president’s wife and staff ran the administration in Wilson’s place, with the president reduced to little more than a figurehead.

Today such a thing was supposed to be impossible — the Constitution’s 25th Amendment, ratified in 1967, spells out what’s meant to happen when a president is non compos mentis.

Voters were left in no doubt about Biden’s mental incapacity after his disastrous debate with Donald Trump in June of last year.

Democratic insiders already knew the score, but they were content to keep Biden in the race and even in power, until the public’s discovery of his condition made perpetuating the charade impossible.

Even so, Biden didn’t resign and his autopen continued to issue orders, including quite likely life-and-death decisions about clemency.

To stop injustices, voters have to be able to hold officials accountable.

But which officials can they hold to account for an autopen?

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris haven’t escaped the public’s judgment, but behind them were Democrats whose names are unknown, yet whose actions America will long have to live with.

Whatever shadowy collective was behind the Biden autopen is still out there.

The Trump administration is right to investigate who was really in charge of our government when the elected president evidently was not.

What happened under Biden was a coup, and it’s not mitigated by the fact that Democrats committed a coup against an incapable president of their own party.

The autopen is meant to represent the president, not take his place.

Cleaning up the crime in our streets is impossible without cleaning up the way government works, and that means unmasking the officials responsible for decisions that endanger lives.

They can’t be allowed to hide behind an automated signature or leaders who don’t know what their pens are writing.

Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.